A School Crotch Inspector?

Just when you think you have heard it all:

I just got finished reading a editorial about a 13-year old school girl, Savana, who got strip searched after another girl, named Marissa, claimed she had gotten a few 400-milligram ibuprofen pills and one non-prescription naproxen tablet from her.
The editorial’s author, Jacob Sullum, is absolutely right! There are definitely two kinds of people in the world: liberal lunatics who think it’s perfectly acceptable to strip search a 13-year-old girl suspected of bringing ibuprofen to school, and conservatives … the kind of people who think those other people should be kept as far away from children as possible.

The first group … the liberal lunatics … does include officials at Safford Middle School in Safford, Ariz., who forced eighth-grader Savana Redding to prove she wasn’t concealing Advil in her cleavage or in her crotch, and the two judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (that same loony, terrorist friendly district in California), who ruled that the strip search did not violate Savana’s Fourth Amendment rights, and …. anyone else who thinks this is acceptable behavior for school staff.

In October 2003, Vice Principal Kerry Wilson, acting on a tip, found a few 400-milligram ibuprofen pills (each equivalent to two over-the-counter tablets) and one nonprescription naproxen tablet in the pockets of a student named Marissa, who claimed Savana was her source.

Savana, an honors student with no history of disciplinary trouble or drug problems, denied knowing anything about the pills and agreed to a search of her backpack, which turned up nothing incriminating. Vice Principal Wilson, as yet undaunted, instructed a female secretary to strip search Savana under the school nurse’s supervision, without even bothering to contact the girl’s mother.

According to Sullum, the secretary had Savana remove all her clothing except her underwear. Savana was then told her to “pull her bra out and to the side and shake it, exposing her breasts,” and then to “pull her underwear out at the crotch and shake it, exposing her pelvic area.” It would seem that Jacob Sullum is right when he states that it is sometimes very hard to tell the difference between “drug warriors and child molesters.”

Savana said in an affidavit, “I was embarrassed and scared … but felt I would be in more trouble if I did not do what they asked. I held my head down so they could not see I was about to cry.” She stated it was the most humiliating experience she had ever had. The principal, Robert Beeman, said, “he did not think the strip search was a big deal because they did not find anything.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that a public school official’s search of a student is constitutional if it is “justified at its inception” and “reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.”

This search was neither.

When Vice Principal Wilson ordered the search, the only evidence he had that Savana had violated any school policy was the uncorroborated accusation by Marissa … a girl who was already in trouble herself and looking to shift the blame.

Savana was so closely supervised after Wilson approached her, that she did not have any opportunity to get rid of any contraband she might have had stashed in her crotch or her cleavage.

According to the editorial, a representative of the American Civil Liberties Union (and … I simply can’t believe I am agreeing with the ACLU) stated that, “There was no reason to suspect that a 13-year-old honor-roll student with a clean disciplinary record had adopted drug-smuggling practices associated with international narcotrafficking, or to suppose that other middle-school students would willingly consume ibuprofen that was stored in another student’s crotch.”

The invasiveness of the search should also be weighed carefully against the evil it was aimed at preventing. “After all, the school district’s lawyer recently told ABC News by way of justification, “this was prescription-strength ibuprofen.”

I can only shake my head in total disbelief!

There is no way a strip search of a 13-year-old could be considered reasonable in scope when searching for Ibuprofen! While it is true that carrying and passing out prescription drugs in school is wrong and the search of the backpack was perhaps in order, was it necessary to strip search her? How about searching her locker first … or calling her parents … or calling the cops? Any of these alternatives would have been more reasonable in scope and likely much more productive in obtaining any illegal drugs and/or reprimanding the offending student.

I feel this action was clearly outside the bounds of the U.S. Constitution and … even further outside the bounds of common sense and decency. If a search is so important that it is deemed necessary to expose the most private parts of a student’s body … then it is important enough to get the police involved. Even if the lunatic progressive, left-wing, terrorist-friendly radical 9th Circuit Court did somehow find that the school administrator’s conduct was legal in this case … that does not mean it was ethical! Nor does it mean it was the best available action in response to the incident.

6 thoughts on “A School Crotch Inspector?”

  1. Darren, that’s just sick. It could easily be either a pervert’s thrill-seeking or overarching government through the local schools teaching kids who is in complete control here.

  2. Absolutely! I would be having strong words with Vice Principal Wilson and the school nurse were that my daughter, and perhaps pursuing some kind of legal action against them.

    And … honestly, I am not sure which scenario bothers me worse … the pervert or the overarching local government.

    Like other criminals, perverts and sexual predators are a fact of life and are something we must learn to protect our children from and deal with as good parents and as a society … but to have a government official performing such ill-conceived and outrageous acts under the guise of “official authority” is very scary in its own right.

  3. From hearing of this story I have a problem coming to grips of the sick acts of the School officials involved and even the Nazi minded courts for siding with the School.

  4. “liberal lunatics who think it’s perfectly acceptable to strip search a 13-year-old girl suspected of bringing ibuprofen to school”

    Are you a complete moron, or only partially brain damaged?

    Where in the world do you get the idea that this was some sort of LIBERAL thing?
    This zero-tolerance war-on-drugs stupidity comes right out of core conservative values (freedom for corporations, obedience for humans.)

    (I simply can’t believe I am agreeing with the ACLU)

    Neither can I actually, frankly I would have expected you to defend the strip search as being “collateral damage” in the “war on drugs” or some other equally stupid thing. After all, that’s the sort of mealy-mouthed nonsense your side has been spewing for decades.

    It’s hysterical that people like me, who value constitutional rights, are always mocked by right-wingers, UNLESS it’s the 2nd Amendment in question.

  5. Although on the surface (despite your typical liberal name calling tactics) you seem to make a good point … you really miss the point completely.

    No conservative in the true sense of the word would be for any school official “strip searching” their child. Conservatives believe children should be raised (and, thereby, disciplined) by their parents. Liberals are the one who want to put it all in the hands of a failing public school system.

    It is this “It takes a village” crap that leads to parents being held responsibile for their child’s behavior while any effective means of disciplining their children is taken away (See California’s attempt to ban spanking).

    The NEA is hardly a conservative organization and it rules the failing public schools systems in this country with a liberal iron claw.

    I am a conservative, and the first school official that strip searches my child is going to have to deal with me … and they won’t like it one bit!!

    Yes … Conservatives do believe in freedom to do business … corporate or otherwise. We also believe in the rule of law … even laws we may not agree with until we can get them changed. Many of us also believe in a Divine Law as well. So, if that’s what you mean by obedience for humans … I guess you are right … in a twisted sort of way.

    The fact that you thought I would defend strip searching as being “collateral damage” in the “war on drugs” tells me you don’t know a great deal about true conservativism and have fallen prey to your own liberal propaganda.

    And … if you think the legalization of drugs is a good idea, I suggest you visit Amsterdam. Oh yes … I know the drug addicts simply love it there. However, the rest of the country of Holland is asking, “My God … what have we done?”

  6. “Liberal” and “Conservative” are just vague, mostly meaningless labels, as far as I’m concerned. We’re both reasonable people who know a school doesn’t have the right to strip-search its students.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.