So Democrats are bashing President Bush for his comments about negotiating with terrorists and radicals. They have a right to say what they believe, and it makes things simple for people like me because they sound like idiots. I was told growing up that “You got 2 ears and one mouth, so listen more than you talk.” However it seems that the Democrats never learned this.
In a speech to the Israeli Parliament President Bush included the following lines, which have drawn fire from Democrats, and their pet reporters;
“”Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
Ok so Obama says that he is not saying that he will negotiate with terrorists, that’s all well and good, but he says nothing about the radicals, of which Iran is one, in fact he supports sitting down at the table with Iran, because if we discuss this like rational people Iran might decide that destroying Israel and The U.S.A. is not a good thing. What a load of crap. I have never considered Iran rational, and since they have espoused the idea that they should destroy Israel so many times I’m not exactly sure what, or even if, Obama is thinking.
Then there is the fact that Hillary Rodham Clinton says something along the lines of “comparing any Democrat to Nazi appeasers is wrong.” Ok, so we are not allowed to call Democrats what they truly are, appeasers, so shall we call them spineless cowards, who have never studied history. The fact that people still believe that you can negotiate with people who have so clearly expressed their contempt as Iran has done for Israel and others, yet Democrats still want to negotiate with them. Of course Neville Chamberlin believed he could negotiate with Hitler after several overt acts of aggression including the annexation of the Sudetenland and the events of Kristallnacht. So to me it is still a viable comparison, calling Democrats appeasers, or spineless shortsighted fools, both work for me.
3 thoughts on “Democrats = Appeasers”
Darren, spineless cowards, appeasers, traitors, evil…The Democrats are all that and more. So far the thought police aren’t dragging us off to jail for expressing that though there may come a day in the future where we are silenced since both Obama and Hillary are fans of Alinsky, a Marxist who believed in maximum control and manipulation of the masses.
Aurora, your comment hits it right on the head, however people don’t see it they merely that sticky sweet “we’re in it for the poor oppressed lower class” and take it at face value. Because as much as I hate to say it the majority of the people in America are to shallow to look under the surface and see the Democrats for what they are.
hey peopl here islam s not like tht if u want the real of it search deep inside . and i am sure u ‘ll find wht u lookin 4 . so pleas leave these jwesh ideas about islam . cause they r had black hearts . they want the world n fire . every one hats the other like them . but let me tell u somthing man . u don’t know any thing about islam at all really . so i suggest u must learn the meanning of islam first . then think wid ur mind .finally learn every thing about islam not his people. cause there’s not one on the world s perfect . by the way look for the shinening side of muslims they r not like tht all . they r not perfect . i was christain . now i am proud 2 be muslime .sure it’s the best feeling in the whole world . so please think million time b4 talking about thing tht u don’t know about . thank u