Tag: Sarah Palin

Political

The Left Aready “Hard at Work” Vilifying Paul Ryan!
Official portrait of Congressman .
Official portrait of Congressman . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

You can tell when liberals are worried!  They start arrogantly pontificating about that which scares them and proceed to attack it with all the vicious smear tactics available to them.  Look at what they did to Sarah Palin!  Judging by the vicious smear campaign waged against Governor Palin, they must really be scared to death of Paul Ryan!  Obama’s liberal media lap-dogs, left-wing blogs, Bill Maher, etc; are all jumping on the “murder Paul Ryan” bandwagon!  And … we haven’t even gotten to Joy Baher, Rosanne Barr, or the View yet!

I found this great article by Charles C.W. Cook, who writes for the National Review.  I enjoyed reading it and I believe he has a very accurate grasp of the situation at hand.  I included the article here in its entirety.  I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

The American songwriter and comedian Tom Lehrer once wrote that he didn’t “want to satirize George Bush,” but instead “to vaporize him.” Given Lehrer’s talent for satire, this represented something of a regression. Nonetheless, he was in good company, for, in the world of politics, “vaporization” is a popular choice.

The preference for annihilation over disapprobation has rarely been so luminously on display as during this week. Since Mitt Romney announced his nomination of Paul Ryan for the vice presidency, the House Budget Committee chairman has been metamorphosed into the devil, and a phalanx of those freshly diagnosed with Ryan Derangement Syndrome has been released into the unsuspecting public.

Chief among this merry band of hysterics is Esquire’s Charles P. Pierce. Pierce has led the charge against Ryan since Saturday morning’s disclosure, christening the congressman the “zombie-eyed granny-starver,” a “murderer of opportunity,” a “political coward,” and, sarcastically, one presumes, the “Pericles of Janesville.” As Pierce breathlessly explains, Ryan is not merely a man with a differing view of the role of the federal government and a good-faith, if controversial, plan to secure the future, but

an authentically dangerous zealot. He does not want to reform entitlements. He wants to eliminate them. He wants to eliminate them because he doesn’t believe they are a legitimate function of government. He is a smiling, aw-shucks murderer of opportunity, a creator of dystopias in which he never will have to live. This now is an argument not over what kind of political commonwealth we will have, but rather whether or not we will have one at all, because Paul Ryan does not believe in the most primary institution of that commonwealth: our government.

As well there should be, there will be criticism as long as there is politics; and, certainly, one would not expect the Left to like Paul Ryan very much. For starters, Ryan has long had the gauche temerity to observe — in public, no less — that all is not rosy in America’s fiscal future. In doing so, he seems determined to play Senator Seneca to President Obama’s Nero, and it is for this, as much as anything else, that he has carved out his role as Enemy No. 1 of the progressive Left. Those who believe that entitlements run on good intentions will always hate men who come armed with spreadsheets, especially when those spreadsheets neatly explode the myth that all of America’s problems can be solved by increasing taxes on the rich. But Pierce’s hyperbole transcends mere disagreement, as does his dismissal of all those who dissent as “gobshites.” Instead, he seeks to remove Paul Ryan — and his ideas — from polite conversation.

Language such as this is not new, even if Pierce’s is saltier than usual. Descriptions of impending “dystopias” are trotted out every time that a long-term conservative plan is posited. Thanks to Joe Biden’s plagiarism, Neil Kinnock’s famous warning was played on both sides of the Atlantic:

If Margaret Thatcheris re-elected as prime minister on Thursday, I warn you. I warn you that you will have pain — when healing and relief depend upon payment. I warn you that you will have ignorance — when talents are untended and wits are wasted, when learning is a privilege and not a right. I warn you that you will have poverty — when pensions slip and benefits are whittled away by a government that won’t pay in an economy that can’t pay. I warn you that you will be cold — when fuel charges are used as a tax system that the rich don’t notice and the poor can’t afford.

As a rule, delirious warnings such as these typically represent better literature than prognostication. In reality, the tough choices made by Mrs. Thatcher in England and the Reagan/Bush administrations in the United States did not create an “economy that can’t pay,” but one that did. As a result of the tough love of conservatives in the 1980s, the very social programs that Kinnock and Biden warned were threatened with extinction were provided with the revenues on which they rely — for a time, at least. On the left, this is the truth that dare not speak its name.

For good measure, Pierce has also exploited Ryan’s lack of foreign-policy experience, deftly linking Paul Ryan to Ronald Reagan, Elliott Abrams, and other “zombie-eyed nun-killers” — all of whom, he claims, “winked at the rape and murder of American churchwomen in Central America.” Maybe, Pierce suggests,

during a break at his next foreign-policy briefing, Paul Ryan, devout Catholic, can ask his primary foreign-policy mentor whether the guy’s feelings about gunning down archbishops in the middle of mass have evolved over the years.

The not-so-subtle implication: Ryan’s Catholicism is dangerous.

Not to be outdone on the religion front, in Time, Erika Christakis spent her two cents knocking Ryan’s piety. “Jesus’ teachings regarding wealth are nowhere to be found in Ryan’s budget proposal,” she averred. Why? Because,

as near as we can tell, Jesus would advocate a tax rate somewhere between 50% (in the vein of “If you have two coats, give one to the man who has none”) and 100% (if you want to get into heaven, be poor). Mostly, he suggested giving all your money up for the benefit of others. And Jesus made no distinction between the deserving and undeserving poor; his love and generosity applied to all.

Aha! Paul Ryan believes in low taxes; ergo, Paul Ryan is not a good Christian. Theology is a complex matter, and complex matters are subject to much legitimate debate. What tax rate Jesus would have advocate eludes minds greater than Christakis’s. But it is somewhat remarkable that at no point in her piece does she cite anything Jesus said about government to back up her argument. Many Christians — Paul Ryan included — would presumably argue that they are not permitted to subcontract their personal obligations to their fellow man to the government, let alone force others to uphold such obligations. Many non-religious people would agree with this conception of virtue, too. But this is an irrelevance. The purpose of Christakis’s column is to provide a vehicle that allows her to reach her conclusion, that the Ryan plan is “not noblesse oblige,” but “cruelty.”

Over at Salon, Joan Walsh spent 1,000 words contriving an argument that, amazingly enough, concurs with her upcoming book, What’s the Matter with White People — Paul Ryan is white and hates “the other”! — and simultaneously slams Ryan for “fakery”:

The man who wants to make the world safe for swashbuckling, risk-taking capitalists hasn’t spent a day at economic risk in his entire life.

Walsh goes on to allege that Ryan is the “pampered scion of a construction empire.” To anyone familiar with Ryan’s biography, this is absurd enough on its face, but, arguendo, let’s pretend that it’s true for a moment and also take into account the corresponding complaint that Ryan has spent his entire adult life in government. Does this automatically render him incorrect on federal budgeting matters as Walsh implies? Milton Friedman used to ask members of his audiences who accused him of never having been poor whether there was anyone among them “who is going to say that you don’t want a doctor to treat you for cancer unless he himself has had cancer”? Walsh’s cheap tu quoque deserves to be dismissed to the sound of the laughter that used to greet Friedman’s rejoinder.

In fact, her whole piece does. To get an impression of how deep the derangement against Paul Ryan runs, consider that the first grievance Walsh includes is that as a young man Ryan chose to go “to Miami University of Ohio, paying twice as much tuition as an Ohio resident would have,” the problem apparently being that “the in-state University of Wisconsin system (which I attended) apparently wasn’t good enough for Ryan.” In-state tuition wasn’t good enough for President Obama either, and in-country tuition didn’t satisfy Bill Clinton, but neither of those appear to vex Walsh. Why?

At The Daily Beast, Michael Tomasky interpreted the pick as evidence that he was correct about Mitt Romney being a “wimp” all along:

Paul Ryan? Really? It’s a stunning choice. A terrible one too. By making it, Mitt Romney tells America that he is not his own man and hasn’t even the remotest fleeting desire to be his own man. He is owned by the right wing. Did I write a couple of weeks ago that Romney was insecure? Well — Q.E.D.

That’s convenient, then.

If we remain on this course, the wheelchair will reach the cliff without any need for Paul Ryan’s involvement. Sure, Ryan’s plan is not the only way of dealing with the looming crisis. But, as Timothy Geithner admitted, the administration does not have one at all. “What we do know,” he told Ryan in February, “is we don’t like yours.” With this statement, Geithner confirmed what many had long suspected: The administration is terrified of reality.

Paul Ryan has volunteered himself as the face of that reality, and he is going to suffer a bright spotlight as a result, especially having been pushed even further into national prominence. The Left has evidently concluded that if it can vaporize Paul Ryan, it can vaporize his ideas. Time will tell if they are correct, but, regardless, economic gravity — and not hyperbole — will have the last laugh.

I would just ask voters to get beyond the media hype and hate-speech delivered up in heaping helpings by the progressive liberal left.

Instead … think for yourself!  Get the facts.   Do some honest research yourself!  Check voting records!  Read ObamaCare!  Actually read Ryan’s budget proposal …  it does not “murder” medicare.  It saves it.  It changes nothing for those already on Medicare!  It just gives younger folks severl options in the future … including continuing with the plan as it stands right now!  On the contrary … Obama has already cut $750 million from Medicare to fund ObamaCare.  How is he saving it?   Maintaining the status quo will certainly cause medicare and social security to fail … with no help from anyone!   Even Tim Geithner admitted Obama’s administration does not have any plan!!  They just do not like Ryan’s plan … because it preserves individual choice.

“Hope and Change” has turned into “Attack and Blame!”   Obama and his cronies live in some sort of utopian fantasy land where they live like kings while everyone else is happily living lives of mediocrity … suckling at the teat of a bloated central government! It is time for some real change … based on common sense, sound economic principles, and the ability to make the needed tough decisions … rather than pandering to bundlers and buying votes with new unsustainable entitlement programs.

Related articles
Political

Here’s the New, Kinder, More Liberal AMERIKA … Bitch!
English: Sarah Palin speaking at a rally in El...
English: Sarah Palin speaking at a rally in Elon, NC during the 2008 Presidential Campaign. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Parts of  this post may be offensive to some people.  If the coarse language in the included quotes that were spewed forth by liberals bothers you, please don’t read this post.  I apologize for the quotes, but the point needs to be made!

When SCOTUS upheld ObamaCare’s individual mandate, Sarah Palin tweeted this message to her followers:

Obama lied to the American people. Again. He said it wasn’t a tax. Obama Lied, Freedom died.

So, this is Sarah Palin’s opinion, stated with absolutely no foul language or personal attacks (and I would say … based soundly on the available facts).  The liberal response is something else entirely!  Again, do not read this if you are easily offended by the liberal version of 1st Amendment free speech

@RFLAWLESS:  White Bitch, With your slut daughter and retard child

@Dike_Turner:  And your retard baby cries?

@insanityreport:  Levi Johnston got in your daughter’s thighs

@O_Sh1tT:  shut up bitch before we run a train on your slut ass daughter.

@whtwoudjesusdo   Go suck a %#*! with your daughter bitch  (edited for descency)

The last one by @whtwoudjesusdo about say’s it all … doesn’t it!  I feel I can safely say Jesus would do, or even say, nothing of the sort!   Just so you know … if you have a Twitter account, you can reply back to these wonderful liberals and let them know how much you admire their oh-so-enlightened verbal gems!

Ok!  What if Justice Robert’s and the SCOTUS ruled the individual mandate penalty is a tax?  Well, Congress does have the ability to create taxes …  and Congress also has the  ability to rescind them.  Roberts gave us the means to end ObamaCare.  Upon Congress’ return from its July recess,  they should act immediately to repeal this terrible new tax on the American  people, and in fact, they should repeal Obamacare in its entirety.  But they won’t … unless thinking American citizens (you know … Americans who can actually think beyond launching vile attacks on Sarah Palin’s children) stand up and force them to!!

This is the most brazen, underhanded, sweeping new tax (and abusive government overreach) imposed on the American people in the history of this country!

The American People did not ask for this tax!  We do not want this tax!  We certainly can’t afford  this tax!  ObamaCare is not the answer to America’s health care  issues.

Is Sarah Palin wrong?  Did Obama Lie?  More and more about what was actually written into the ObamaCare bill that Robert Creamer and SEIU wrote, and nobody in Congress had time to read before they passed it to find out what was in it … is slowly coming to light!  You tell me:

Lie #1: Obama said, “Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase.”

Reality: The individual mandate is far from being alone on Heritage’s lengthy list of Obamacare’s new taxes and penalties, many of which will heavily impact the middle class.  Altogether, Obamacare’s taxes and penalties will accumulate an additional $500 billion in new revenue over a 10-year period. Yesterday, a senior economist for The Wall Street Journal revealed that 75 percent of Obamacare’s new taxes will be paid for by American families making under $120,000 a year.  Among the taxes that will hit the middle class are the individual mandate, a 2.3 percent excise tax on medical devices, a 10 percent excise tax on indoor tanning, and an increase of the floor on medical deductions from 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income to 10 percent.

Lie #2: Obama said, “If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period.”

Reality: Research continues to show that as many as 30 percent of employers will dump their employees from their existing health care coverage. The Administration itself has admitted that “as a practical matter, a majority of group health plans will lose their grandfather status by 2013.”

Lie #3: Obama said, “I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits—either now or in the future.”

Reality: As Heritage analysts explain, “A close examination of what [the Congressional Budget Office] said, as well as other evidence, makes it clear that the deficit reduction associated with [Obamacare] is based on budget gimmicks, sleight of hand, accounting tricks, and completely implausible assumptions. A more honest accounting reveals the new law as a trillion-dollar budget buster.”

Lie #4: Obama said “I will protect Medicare.”

Reality: A Heritage Factsheet shows the various ways Obamacare ends Medicare as we know it, including severe physician reimbursement cuts that threaten seniors’ access to care and putting an unelected board of bureaucrats in charge of meeting Medicare’s new spending cap.

Lie #5: Obama said, “I will sign a universal health care bill into law by the end of my first term as president that will cover every American and cut the cost of a typical family’s premium by up to $2,500 a year.”

Reality: Obamacare does not accomplish universal coverage; it leaves 26 million Americans without insurance. Moreover, Heritage research outlines 12 ways that Obamacare will increase premiums instead of reducing health care costs. Requirements that plans allow young adults to stay on their parents’ coverage and offer preventive services with no cost sharing are already leading to higher growth in premiums.

Polls show 70 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable view of the individual mandate. It’s doubtful that Justice Robert’s calling it a “tax” will dramatically change their opinion. Now that Obamacare and its endless lies with sky-rocketing costs will remain the law of the land, it’s up to the American people (as it should be) to see to it that the law is ultimately repealed by Congress. Then, maybe we can move forward with real health care reform that actually puts patients’ health care needs (instead of the government’s need for more power) first.

Related articles
Political

Rush: Obama Having a “Dictator’s Wet Dream!”

Rush Limbaugh Cartoon by Ian D. Marsden of mar...

We all now Rush Limbaugh is no stranger to controversy, but his statements on Monday statements have sent Media Matters readers into a crazed feeding frenzy and inspired all manner of truly enlightened commentary from the liberal media.

Rush commentated on Obama‘s bypassing Congress by “Imperial Fiat” to stop young illegal immigrants from being deported by saying, “So once again we see which side Obama comes down on, in the question of whether [we are] a country with the rule of law, or the rule of man.  With Obama, it’s not the rule of law.  He is implementing law that the Congress defeated, as in the legalization of the amnesty for 800,000 young illegals– Congress defeated that, the Dream Act.”

And, truthfully, that is exactly what Obama did.  Do you remember American Government or Social Studies in elementary school?  The Legislature (Congress) passes the laws and the Executive (the President) enforces the laws.  I guess they do not teach that anymore!  Well … at least not in Obama’s world; nor does his government follow that Constitutional principle.  Now … if the Legislature doesn’t pass a law Obama like … he creates it by “Imperial Fiat;” and if the Legislature passes a law he doesn’t like …. he simply decrees it will not be enforced!  So much for co-equal branches of government, checks and balances, and democracy!  Say hello to dictatorship! Until this point, Rush was simply stating facts ….

But … then Rush uttered the phrase that really drove the Obama lap-dog media into a lather!  Rush said, “It‘s a dictator’s wet dream to do what Obama is doing.  If he doesn’t agree with the law, voila, it’s no longer enforced.  It may as well not even exist.  That’s who he is, folks!”

Now, when you compare this phrase to some of Bill Maher’s liberal hate speech utterances about Sarah Palin and her family,

Or those of MSNBC‘s Lawrence O’Donnell (Did anyone tell O’Donnell that his buddy, Harry Reid, is a Mormon):

“Mormonism was created by a guy in upstate New York in 1830 when he got caught having sex with the maid and explained to his wife that God told him to do it. Forty-eight wives later, Joseph Smith’s lifestyle was completely sanctified in the religion he invented to go with it. Which Mitt Romney says he believes.”

Or Al Sharpton’s comments:

“White folks was [sic] in caves while we was building empires…. We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it,”

Jesse Jackson’s comments on “Hymie Town” or that “conservatives are apartheid nazis,”

Keith Oberman vicious comments about Crystal Palin, Britt Hume, Michelle Malkin,

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews fantasizing about killing Rush Limbaugh (while Obama sends a chill up his leg),

Sandra Bernhard imagining her friends gang raping Sarah Palin and calling Crystal Palin a hooker on the Joy Behar Show,

Joy Behar saying “This B*tch, Sharron Angle, Is Going to Hell,”

and MSNBC’s Ed Shultz wanting to “rip out Cheney’s heart and lick it around;”

Rush’s comment seems to be pretty mild …. in comparison!  But, hey, liberals never let the facts interfere with a good story!

And, of course, the immediate response from the liberal left was perfect … and so very typical.  No facts, counter-points,  or legitimate argument contrary to the point Rush was making (because there really aren’t any … Rush is Right); just typical liberal personal attacks and name calling.  It is sad to think the future of America is in the hands of people who thing these are opposing points in an argument:

  • One Media Matters commentator asked, “If he’s such a dictator, why is he letting a d*ck like you stay on the radio, Rush?”
  • Another wrote: “See, here’s a subject Fats is an expert on. He often has wet dreams about being a dictator. A dictator on an island filled with nothing but teenaged Dominican boys…”
  • And, yet another, who likely did not listen to Limbaugh’s explanation commented, nor has ever read the Constitution of the United States quipped, “So, the Constitution of the United States is a ‘dictator’s wet dream’?”

Limbaugh clarified that he didn’t say this in a jocular manner.  That fact is that, if Obama can simply decide which laws he will enforce or obey and which he won’t;  what does prevent Obama from deciding, for example, that he doesn’t like the 22nd amendment (which limits presidents to only two terms) and simply decides it will no longer be enforced?

Liberals will snort and and gaze down at you over their up-turned noses and say:

Come on Rush, there’s no way Obama would ever dispense with elections…

There’s no way Obama would ever not enforce immigration law…

No way Obama would ignore the Constitution and just write a health care law that basically pees all over it…

Of course He wouldn’t!

Rush then asked,  “What if we started obeying laws on that [basis]?  If the president of the United States can choose to enforce or not enforce law because he likes them or doesn’t like them, what about us?  What if we disagree with the speeding law?…What if we don’t like paying income tax, because frankly, I hate it.  What if I just decide, screw it!”

“But of course, we don’t have that ability,” Limbaugh concluded.

I would say we do!  That was the whole idea behind the American Revolution!!

Related articles
Political

Polish Death Camps!?

Nazi extermination camps in occupied Poland, m...Ok!  I’m sorry but I just can’t help it!

Can you image the sanctimonious, selective liberal outrage we would have been subjected to had George W. Bush, a conservative like Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, or pretty much any republican had misspoken and called Nazi death camps in Poland … Polish death camps?  The liberal press would have wasted no time in excoriating the transgressor as a stupid, right-wing, nazi-loving, drooling, anti-woman, old-people killing, drunken, hate mongering neocon with latent heterosexual and homicidal tendencies, etc.!  I mean Bill Maher would have had material for at least a month’s worth of left-wing verbal diarrhea!

However, since it was the anointed-one, Barack Obama, who committed the gaff …. he simply “misspoke.”

Related articles
Political

A Response to a Reader’s Comments:
Healthcare USA, after Anton Bruehl
Healthcare USA, after Anton Bruehl (Photo credit: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com)

As usual, your comment plays on the emotions and fears of the uninformed, but has little in the way of fact and reality.  You paint the picture of “Ron Paul conservatives” cruelly turning people away from urgently needed medical care.  Oh …. those cold-hearted conservative bastards!  They make Scrooge look like Mother Teresa! Did you know conservatives eat their young!   Barak Obama, the Messiah … the Holy One …  will save us all from the evil, fascist, chauvinistic, racist, hate-mongering conservatives!

Don’t like spending nearly a trillion bucks on stimulus?  You’re a racist!   Don’t like ObamaCare?  You’re a racist!

Why is it when liberals rant … it is “free speech,” but when conservatives rant, it is “hate speech?”  Need some examples?  Maybe I can find a few …. it isn’t very hard …

Margaret Carlson of Bloomberg News comparing the Tea Party caucus in Congress to terrorists:  “I mean, they’ve strapped explosives to the Capitol and they think they are immune from it.”

Former Rep. Paul Kanjorski (Dem): “Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to put him against a wall and shoot him.”
 
Barack Obama, 2008 and 2010: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” & “We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends…”
 
New York Times Columnist  Paul Krugman: “A message to progressives: By all means, hang Senator Joe Lieberman in effigy.”
 
Talk show host Montel Williams, directed at Rep. Michele Bachmann: “Michele, slit your wrist. Go ahead… or, do us all a better thing [sic]… start at the collarbone.”
 
Senator Harry Reid, 2008:  Barack Obama is a “light-skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”
 
Reverend Jesse Jackson:  “All Hymie wants to talk about is Israel; every time you go to Hymietown, that’s all they want to talk about.”
 
DNC Charmian Howard Dean:  “You think the Republican National Committee could get this many people of color in a single room?  Only if they had the hotel staff in here.”
 
The Washington Post’s Richard Cohen and CNN:  “How much time do we have left to talk about how stupid Sarah Palin is?”
 
Foul-mouthed comedian Sandra Bernhard warning Sarah Palin she would be “gang-raped by my big black brothers” if she tried coming to New York.
 
Do you remember when Washington Post columnist Courtland Milloy said: “I know how the ‘tea party’ people feel, the anger, venom and bile that many of them showed during the recent House vote on health care reform.  I know because I want to spit on them, take one of their ‘Obama Plan White Slavery’ signs and knock every racist and homophobic tooth out of their Cro-Magnon heads.”
 
Remember when Liberal talk radio host Mike Malloy said: “Drudge? Aw, Drudge, somebody ought to wrap a strong Republican entrail around his neck and hoist him up about 6 feet in the air and watch him bounce.”
 
And of course, we all know about Bill Maher ….
 
Remember when “stupid” Sarah Palin made Rahm Emanuel’s expletive-enhanced use of the word “retarded” an embarrassment for him and the the Anointed One?  She forced the left to live up to its own P.C. standards. Saul Alinsky would have been proud.
 
But I digress ….
 
There will still be millions of un-insured under Obamacare.  The cost for Obamacare has already been revised by the CBO from the original estimate of approx. $900 Billion to $1.8 Trillion … and it will continue to grow. The programs you mention; Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are, themselves, on the verge of collapse; therefore taxes will skyrocket to subsidise them and yet another massive, unsustainable entitlement bureaucratic-nightmare called Obamacare. 
 

Doctors are fleeing the medical field or making decisions to not accept government-based healthcare plans because reimbursement levels are already too low and shrinking.  (I know this because I have several friends who are doctors … and no they are not greedy monsters.  They are normal folks, whose business costs are skyrocketing because of massive paperwork involved with regulatory compliance forced on them by Obamacare). 

Enrollment in medical school is down because not too many students can afford to take on such massive debt in the form of the student loans required to complete a medical degree program … for the dwindling return on their investment. Doctor’s work very hard for their degrees (typically for at least 7 years) and incur a great deal of debt achieving it.  To begrudge them a higher salary than folks who, say,  decided to flip hamburgers for a living or just go on the public dole …  is pretty short-sighted and very small-minded!  

Tell me  … do you begrudge George Soros, Warren Buffett,  AL Gore, John Kerry, or George Clooney their massive incomes?

And yes … even those dastardly, despicable, racist, hate-mongering, tea bagging, slutty, conservatives (who hate autistic children, the mentally challenged, and who want old people to die starving in the streets) want American citizens to have access to affordable, transportable, quality health insurance.  The problem is that Obamacare will not provide that.  It will only bankrupt the country.

I am not a big fan of Ron Paul.  I don’t believe Ron Paul is actually a true conservative.  I like some of his domestic positions, but he is not truly a Constitutionalist.  If you go back to Ron Paul’s early years and his influences, they include a list of folks who detested conservatives and the U.S. Constitution.  Ron Paul mostly uses the U.S. Constitution as a hammer to bash all other candidates on the head.  His foreign policy is to the left of even Barack Obama’s and I feel would be disastrous for this country and the rest of the world.  Isolationist-based  policies have indirectly caused several wars including World War I, World War II, and The Vietnam Conflict.   His roots are, perhaps, slightly less scary than Barack Obama’s;  while Obama is a Saul Alinsky “inspired” socialist, Ron Paul is essentially a Murry Rothbard inspired free-market anarchist.

Political

New Video Game Lets You “Slaughter” Beck, Palin, O’Reilly
Zombies
Image via Wikipedia

Ok!  A video game company in Brooklyn, N.Y., that has created a violent first-person shooter game targeting conservatives called “Tea Party Zombies Must Die.”  How cool is that?  When playing the game, users can bludgeon Bill O’Reilly with a crow bar, shoot Glenn Beck with a semi-automatic weapon, and stab former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin with a knife.  Such good clean progressive-liberal fun.  And progressive-liberals say conservatives are angry, violent, and racist!!?  Some other high-profile conservatives game players can gleefully massacre while playing this video game include former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Fox News commentator Brit Hume, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, and the Koch Brothers.

Really, I am not all that surprised.  After all, aren’t progressive-liberals are the driving force behind legally murdering unborn children, eugenics, and health care rationing … to include helpful “end of life” committees.

Not surprisingly Glenn Beck recently blasted the video game saying: “This is one of the most violent things I’ve ever seen, where you’re walking in, you’re the zombie hunter and you’re walking in the front door of FOX News and you’re shooting me and Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann and Sean Hannity, you’re just shooting all of us or you’re cutting us in half with a machete.”

Can you imagine the onslaught of screaming liberals and the drive-by media outrage that would be generated if a “conservative” video game company created a game where you could brutally “massacre” Barack and Michele Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Ben Bernanke, Bill Maher, or Hillary Clinton?  It would be sheer bedlam … 

Related articles
Political

Why do leftists, liberals, feminists, and even some Republicans hate Sarah Palin so much?

Hi folks,

This is an interesting video from Pajamas TV about that very topic. I think Sarah Palin is probably the last best hope for the Republican Party … after all, the Republicans have done so well over the last 10 years following their conventional wisdom… don’t you think? Check this video out! You can select the video quality on the left side of the player.

http://www.pjtv.com/video/Afterburner_with_Bill_Whittle/_The_Media%2C_The_Left_and_GOP_Elitists_vs_Sarah_Palin%3A_A_Lesson_on_How_to_Destroy_a_Leader/2235/